essay
Islam,
My Islam
I
concluded the first instalment of “Islam,
My Islam” with the assertion that the recent overwhelming
victory by the United
States in Afghanistan was evidence of God’s preference for
Freedom over
Theocracy. I’ll
get back to that—I
hope—next issue (or the issue after:
I
don’t think I’m going to be able to finish this in
three parts as I originally
planned), in the meantime, I thought it worth doing a Reader’s
Digest version
(assuming Reader’s Digest would ever run
anything this long) of the
early history of Islam excerpted from Essad Bey’s Muhammad,
A Biography,
a 1936 incarnation of Ibn Ishaq’s original biography from the
eighth
century. Please
note that this is not
Scripture. Although
all biographies of
Muhammad have their origins in Ibn Ishaq’s work and feature
the same events,
there is a lot of commentary and variations,
conclusions drawn,
different phrasing in direct quotes.
As
opposed to Scripture: where a Koran from the eighth century contains
the same
words as a Koran from the twentieth century.
And with that caveat emptor:
Part
III
The Prophet Muhammad was born in the
year 570. While his mother, Amina, was pregnant with him, his father,
Abdallah
died. Then his mother died when he was six and the orphan was raised by
his
grandfather. His grandfather, Abdul Muttalib, was the acknowledged
leader of
the Koreish tribe, guardians of the Holy City of Mecca (“We
are the sons of
Abraham, men of honour, governors of the house of Allah, inhabitants of
Mecca. No Arab has
such virtue as we, nor such
dignity as we. No
man of the Koreish
should honour territory which is secular in the way he honours that
which is
sacred—Mecca, the Sanctuary and the holy
territory—and the profane—that which
is outside the sacred limits.”)
When
Abdul Muttalib died none of his sons was influential enough to succeed
him and
leadership and influence began to pass to the descendants of his cousin
Omayya. After the
death of his
grandfather, Muhammad was entrusted to the custody of his uncle, Abu
Talib.
Muhammad
worked a variety of jobs as a
young man—the best of which was as a superintendent in the
house of a twice
divorced (or widowed, accounts vary) woman named Khadija, reputedly the
most
honoured woman among the Koreish because of her lineage: not only the
highest
in nobility but also the richest in property.
Muhammad became her “cameleer”, a
merchant travelling in caravans,
conducting business and trade on her behalf, a trade at which he proved
to be
adept. Quite taken
as she was with the
young man, Khadija—some twenty years his
senior—proposed to him and he
accepted. She
contrived to hold a dinner
where she got her father Khowailid so drunk that he was unaware that he
was
giving her permission to marry one of her servants in exchange for a
dowry of a
few camels. She and
Muhammad were
faithfully married to one another for twenty-four years until her death. She was the only one of
his wives to bear him
children: three daughters who lived and three sons (Qasim, Abd Menaf
and Atakhir)
who died.
One of
the greatest events in the history
of the city of Mecca took place during Muhammad’s lifetime:
the reconstruction
of the Kaaba, the sacred cube which Arab pilgrims circumambulated on
the hajj,
or pilgrimage. The
original Kaaba had,
reputedly, been built by Adam and had housed, since mankind’s
beginnings, the
sacred white stone—the ruku as it is
called, which Adam had brought to
earth with him—white as the wings of an
archangel—and which, it
was said, absorbed men’s sins when they
kissed it so that, even by Muhammad’s time, it had become
black as night with
the sins it will hold until Judgement Day.
The Kaaba was later reconstructed, according to legend, by
Abraham and
Ishmael. Uncertain
if Allah, or the
three-hundred-and-sixty other gods of the Kaaba would permit it to be
torn down
and replaced, one Meccan was selected to begin the demolition. Everyone waited to see if
he would be, you
know, struck by lightning or something.
When nothing happened to him, they all pitched in. And…
…when they reached the foundations
“in the buttress they found an
inscription in Syrian, and knew not what it meant until a Jew read it
for
them: ‘I
am Allah, the lord of Mecca! I created
it when I created the heavens and the earth, when I fashioned the sun
and the
moon, and I have appointed over it seven angels; Mecca will not perish
until
its two hills perish! It
will be blessed
to its inhabitants in water and milk!’
When
they reached further into the foundations they found them to be green
boulders
adhering together like a single stone.
When a man of the Koreish inserted a
lever to separate the
boulders, the whole of Mecca began to shake; so the people touched the
foundation no more.
The groups of Koreish now collected stones for the
rebuilding, each
group gathering separately and they built until they reached the spot
for the ruku……Then
all the people
quarrelled, because each group wished the honour of lifting the stone
into
place. So bitter
were the quarrels that
the groups made alliances and prepared to fight.
One group produced a dish filled with blood
and entered into a covenant unto death with another group by dipping
their
hands into the dish; they were therefore called
blood-lickers…
This
“blood-thirstiness” is a recurring
motif in the Arab world down to the present day and leads even a
cursory
scholar like myself to realize that “Blood-thirsty
Arab” is not hyperbolic but
is, in fact, the equivalent of the “Dirty Goyim”. There are Muslims and
there are Blood-thirsty
Arabs just as there are Christians and there are Dirty Goyim. A recent instalment of
Anne Kingston’s
“Modern Life” in the National Post recalled
the murder of Jordan’s prime
minister Wasfi al-Tal in Cairo’s Sheraton Hotel in 1971 by
Black September, the
first of many “elite” units of Yasser
Arafat’s Al-Fatah thugs and gangsters (a
role played today by the al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigade): “As the
politician lay dying, his blood
flowing across the marble floor, one of the assassins knelt and lapped
up the
blood with his tongue.”
Whoever the
assassin was, he might consider himself a Muslim.
To me, he is just a blood-thirsty Arab.
The situation remained thus for four or five nights; then
the Koreish
assembled in the mosque to consult and reach a decision, and the oldest
man
among them said at last, “Why not let he who next enters
through the door of
this mosque be the arbiter in this quarrel, and let him decide
it?” They
agreed, and the first who entered was
Muhammad. And they
said, “This is el
Amin [Muhammad’s
nickname among the Koreish, meaning the Reliable
One] !
We agree that he shall judge.”
When he
came near they told him of the problem and he said, “Bring me
a cloak.” When
they had brought one, he placed the ruku
in it with his own hands, saying, “Let every group
take hold of a part of
the cloak.” Then
all of them lifted
it together, and
when they reached the
spot, the Apostle placed it in position with his own hands, and the
building
was continued over it.
Sometime
after this, the happily-married
Muhammad—now related by marriage to the wealthiest and most
influential family
in Mecca, prosperous as a merchant and loved by all he came in contact
with—underwent a dramatic change.
Inexplicably,
in a very short span of time,
Muhammad—who had always been careful of his appearance, even
to the point of
vanity—suddenly ceased to care about his attire and his hair. Even more worrisome, from
a Meccan
standpoint, he ceased to care about his business affairs. He began, instead, to
wander the desert and
became an infrequent visitor to his own palatial home.
He became a hanif, one of the unhappy
“seekers-after-God” who inhabited the mountains and
the valleys around
Mecca. One of the
oldest and best-known
of the hanifs was one of Khadija’s
cousins, Waraqa ben Nawfal, a blind
man who had been a heathen, then a Jew and then a Christian and had
been the
first to translate parts of the Holy Scripture into Arabic.
For
months Muhammad lived in and around
Mount Hira, going days without food, progressively more fearful that he
was
possessed by a demon. “All
my life I
have abhorred the magicians and conjurers, and now I fear lest I become
one
myself,” he said to Khadija.
Days, weeks
and months passed by in misery and anguish.
Then
came the night of el Qadr.
In the night of el Qadr, in the month of Ramadan, the Word
of God came
to Muhammad who lay at the entrance to a cave on Mount Hira. Suddenly, he saw a
vision—two eyes, the size
of heaven, pierced through him and he heard a voice as distinct and
clear as
any he had ever heard, say,
“Iqra!”
“Recite!”
And as the voice was clear and easily understood, and had
nothing
terrifying about it, Muhammad answered, truthfully, “I cannot
recite.” Unseen
hands grasped him, threw him to the
ground and began to choke him so that Mohammad thought he would
suffocate. And
again the voice commanded, “Recite.” In deathly fear, Muhammad
answered, “What
shall I recite?” Then
the vision spread
a great cloth before the eyes of the Prophet and, in fiery letters,
Muhammad
read the first revealed sura of the Koran [sura
96 if you’re looking for it: the
suras of the Koran are arranged in descending order of length. “Clots
of Blood”—or “Thick
Blood”, as
it’s also called—is one of the
shortest of the 114 suras]
In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful!
Recite, thou, in the Name of thy Lord who
created—
Created man from clots of blood!
Recite thou! For
thy Lord is the
most beneficent
Who hath taught the use of the pen:
Hath taught man that which he knoweth not.
Nay, verily, man is insolent,
Because he seeth himself possessed of riches.
Verily, to thy Lord is the return of all.
What thinkest thou? Hath
he
followed the guidance? or enjoined piety?
What thinkest thou? Hath
he
treated the truth as a lie and turned his back?
What? Doeth
he not know how that
God seeth?
Nay, verily, if he desisteth not, We shall seize him by
the forelock,
The lying, sinful forelock!
Then, let him summon his associates;
We, too, will summon the guards of Hell.
Nay! Obey him not; but adore and draw nigh.
Suddenly, the vision disappeared and all was silent about
Muhammad. Night lay
over him and the desert slept, as
the world itself slept in the night of el Qadr.
Muhammad arose, stepped out of the cave and climbed to the
top of the
mountain. He saw
the immense canopy of
stars over Arabia, the fantastic pointed rocks and outcroppings, the
city of
Mecca and the Kaaba, the House of God at its center.
And—again—a voice, like the stirring
of the
desert wind, came to his ear and spoke:
Thou
art the Messenger of God, o Muhammad, and I am Gabriel, His archangel.
Then, the voice was silent, the two great eyes looking at
him. Muhammad
looked to the right and to the left,
up and down. All
around him was the
piercing gaze of the archangel. Dizzily,
Muhammad ran down the mountain. Like
a
madman, like one pursued, he ran through the rocky ravines. Until noon
of the
next day, he roamed through the valley
and—everywhere!—the eyes of Gabriel
followed him.
Muhammad
ultimately fled to his home and
to his wife’s side:
“When I came to Khadija I narrated to her what I
had seen and she said,
‘Be of good cheer and comfort thyself!
I
swear by Him in whose hand the life of Khadija is, that I hope thou
wilt be the
prophet of this nation!’
Then she arose,
collected her garments around her and departed to Waraqa.”
She described to him
what Muhammad had seen and heard, and Waraqa exclaimed,
“Holy! Holy! I swear to
Him in whose hands the life of Waraqa is, that the Law of Moses has
been
bestowed upon him and he is the prophet of this nation!
Tell him to stand firm.”
Khadija then returned to the apostle of God
and informed him of what Waraqa had said.
On the following day, Muhammad—still doubting
and disbelieving—went to
the Kaaba. According
to custom, he
circumambulated the holy edifice seven times, and at the seventh time
he came
upon the blind Waraqa. “Tell
me what you
have seen and heard,” Waraqa bade him, and when Muhammad
repeated what Khadija
had already told him, he said with a trembling voice,
“Verily, you are the
Prophet of this people for the greatest of all archangels has appeared
to you. Men will
not believe you. They
will call you a liar, will mistreat you,
damn you and oppose you. Remain
steadfast, however, for you have been called to be the Prophet of the
people.”
And the old man bowed down before Muhammad and kissed him and blessed
him.
“I am the Messenger of God,” said
Muhammad, in the courtyard of the
Kaaba surrounded by three-hundred-and-sixty idols of stone and wood.
The
revelations didn’t resume
for some time and Muhammad began to despair.
Finally
In
order to put
an end to the tortures, the despair and the torments which racked his
soul, the
Prophet decided to climb upon a high peak and cast his
body—which he had become
convinced was possessed by demons—into the yawning void below. He bent down and saw
little stones, which his
foot dislodged, vanish into the deep.
Only one step separated him from everlasting peace. Suddenly, he heard a
voice, low but audible,
in his ear. Muhammad
stood rooted to the
spot. His eyes
swept the horizon, then
he looked up and—high above his head—was the
Indescribable One, the archangel
who revealed to him the second sura [sura 93, “The
Brightness”]:
In the Name of God, the
Compassionate, the Merciful!
By the noon-day brightness and
by the night when it darkeneth!
Thy Lord hath not forsaken thee,
neither hath he been displeased.
And surely shall the future be
better for thee than the past:
And in the end shall thy Lord be
bounteous to thee and thou be satisfied.
Did he not find thee an orphan
and give thee a home?
And found thee erring and guided
thee?
And found thee needy and
enriched thee?
As to the orphan, therefore,
wrong him not;
And as to him that asketh of
thee, chide him not away.
And as for the favours of thy
Lord: tell them abroad.
Accordingly,
God’s Last Apostle began—at first in
secret—to promulgate the gospel bestowed
by God upon him to those of his family whom he trusted:
When prayer was made obligatory to God’s Last
Apostle, Gabriel came to
him when he was in the highest part of Mecca and spurred his heel into
the
ground towards the valley; a spring gushed forth and Gabriel performed
religious ablutions. Muhammad observed how purification for prayers was
to be
made, and washed himself likewise.
Then
Gabriel rose and prayed, and God’s Last Apostle did so after
him, and then
Gabriel departed. When
God’s Last
Apostle came to Khadija he performed the religious ablutions in her
presence to
show her how purity was attained, just as Gabriel had done. And she, too, washed as
she had been
shown. Then the
Apostle prayed as
Gabriel had prayed, and Khadija prayed after him.
Then Gabriel came to him and held noon prayers when the
sun passed its
zenith; and prayed the afternoon prayers with him when his shadow was
the same
length as his own body. Then
he prayed
the sunset prayers when the sun disappeared, and the last evening
prayer when
the twilight disappeared. Next
day, he
held morning prayers with the Apostle at dawn; then the midday prayers
when the
shadow was one with him; and afternoon prayers when it was twice as
long as he;
then the sunset orisons when the sun disappeared as on the preceding
day. Then he prayed
with him the last evening
prayers when the first third of the night had elapsed, and lastly the
morning
prayers, when the morning dawned but the sun had not yet risen. Then he
said,
“O Muhammad! The
time of prayer is
between thy prayers of yesterday and today.”
The
first male to believe in God’s Last
Messenger was Ali, Muhammad’s cousin, whom Muhammad had
adopted when a severe
famine had made the strain of caring for his large family a burden to
Muhammad’s uncle and Ali’s father, Abu Talib.
One
day, Abu
Talib happened to discover them at prayer and asked the Apostle,
“What religion
is this that I see you practicing?”
He
replied, “This is the religion of God, and of His angels, of
His apostles and
of our father Abraham. God
has sent me
with this religion, as an apostle to His servants; and you, my uncle
are the
most worthy on whom I could bestow advice and invitation to guidance;
you are
the most worthy to comply in it and to aid me therein.” But Abu Talib said,
“I cannot abandon the
religion of my forefathers and what they believed in; but no harm shall
be done
to you as long as I live.”
Abu Talib
asked Ali, “What religion is this thou believest
in?” and
Ali replied, “I believe in the Apostle of
God and that his revelation is true.
I
pray with him and I follow him.”
His
father said, “He has called thee only to what is good;
therefore obey him.”
Ali
was ten years old at the time and—after
a dinner which the Prophet had hosted for the men of his family in his
first
attempt to convert them—was the only one to step forward and
profess
Islam. “You
see?” the Apostle of God
said to his relatives, “This is my vizier, my
satrap.” After the death of the
Prophet, this would bring about a fundamental schism within Islam which
makes
the fracture between Catholicism and Protestantism look like a minor
tiff by
comparison. We’ll
get to that in due
course.
The
next to believe was Zayd, who had arrived
from Syria as a slave. A
nephew of
Khadija had given him to her as a present.
When Muhammad saw him he asked Khadija for him and she
agreed. Muhammad
then freed him and adopted him as
his son. Zayd’s
father came looking for
him and found him. Muhammad
gave him the
choice of staying with Muhammad or returning to his father and Zayd
chose to
remain with Muhammad. When God bestowed Muhammad’s mission on
him, Zayd
professed Islam.
Next
to profess Islam was Abu Bakr, Assidiq
(“The True”).
Muhammad later said,
“I have preached Islam to no one who did not hesitate,
consider, and
contradict, save Abu Bakr, who neither hesitated nor was
perplexed.” Abu
Bakr’s popularity among the Koreish led
to Uthman, al-Zubayr, Abdul-Rahman, Sad bin Abu Waqqas and Talha
professing
Islam at his invitation. In
the entire
Arabian peninsula there were now eight Arab men—actually
seven Arab men and one
Arab boy—who believed in One God.
Soon
several
men and women had made their profession of Islam and it was much
discussed in
Mecca. Then God
commanded his Apostle to
make public the revelation and to invite the people to accept it;
hitherto—for
three years since the first revelation—it had been kept
secret. God said to
him, “Publish that which thou
hast been commanded, and turn away from the idolaters.”
When the Apostle began to spread Islam among his people as
God had
commanded him, they did not gainsay him until he began to abuse their
idols.
At
the time, Mecca, the Sanctuary and the
Kaaba had degenerated almost entirely into paganism.
The Sanctuary itself was encircled by the
aforementioned hundreds of pagan idols—including statues of
Abraham and Ishmael
and a painting of the Virgin Mary—and virtually every
religion and
pseudo-religion was welcomed to make the Sanctuary a pilgrimage
destination. The
Koreish had even
instituted a rule that no food could be brought into the sacred
precincts from
outside (which might be where the Disney Corporation got the idea for
Disneyland) and that clothing that was brought from outside and worn
while
performing the circuits of the Kaaba needed to be thrown away
immediately
afterwards for the sake of purity.
Needless to say—given that the sale of food and
clothing in Mecca was a
lucrative source of Koreish wealth—disapproving of the scam
didn’t endear
Muhammad to them:
Several
nobles
of the Koreish, including Utba and Abu Sofyan, went to Abu Talib and
said,
“Your nephew has insulted our gods and condemned our religion. He considers our young men
to be fools and our
fathers to have erred. You
must either
restrain him or allow us free action against him, since your religion
is the
same as ours; opposed to his.”
But the
Apostle continued to preach the religion of God and to seek
conversions, and
the people hated him. Again
they went to
Abu Talib and said, “You are aged, noble and highly respected
among us and we
have already asked you to prohibit your nephew from offending us. But you have not
prohibited him and, by
Allah, we shall not overlook his insults unless you guarantee his
future good
behaviour. Otherwise,
we shall fight
both him and you.” After
this they
departed and Abu Talib was much grieved by the enmity of his tribe; but
he
could not surrender or desert the Apostle of God.
After this visit, Abu Talib sent for the Apostle and said,
“Consider my
life and yours, and do not burden me with what I cannot bear.” God’s Last
Messenger feared from these words
that his uncle had determined to desert him and he said, “If
they were to place
the sun in my right hand and the moon in my left, I would not abandon
my
mission.” Then
tears started in his eyes
and he wept. But
when he turned to
depart, Abu Talib said, “Nephew!
Go, and
speak what you wish. By
Allah! I shall
never fail you.”
And the nobles went once more to Abu Talib and offered him
the brilliant
youth Umara in exchange for Muhammad, but Abu Talib replied,
“It is a wicked
thing you propose, that you give me your son to feed, and I give you
mine to
kill! This shall
never be!”
This
sort of tribal loyalty runs deep
within the Arab heart—both pagan and Muslim—due, in
no small part (I suspect)
to the fact that every Arab and every Muslim recognizes that at any
given point
Abu Talib might have weakened and surrendered Muhammad to the
not-so-tender
mercies of the Koreish and Islam would have died in the cradle. It’s really the
reverse of the Jesus
circumstance: had
the Jews not surrendered
Jesus to the Romans and had Caesar’s representative in
Palestine not ordered
his execution—thus welcoming Jesus’ martyrdom into
the heart of the Roman
Empire and sowing the seeds of that Empire’s
destruction/conversion—Christianity might have died in the
cradle. On a less
exalted level of contemplation, I
think this explains why the offer of $25 million U.S. for Osama bin
Laden and
demands that the Taliban surrender bin Laden into American custody fell
on
entirely and scrupulously deaf Muslim ears.
Faced with the offer, every Afghan, al-Qaeda and Taliban
Muslim became
Abu Talib and Abu Talib can make only one right choice under the
circumstances:
you just don’t surrender a Muslim to the infidels.
Faced
with the season of pilgrimage in
Mecca and an unrepentant Muhammad who continued to preach the Suras
given to
him by the One God, the Koreish needed some sort of explanation for the
pilgrims as to what this fellow Muhammad was
exactly. So
the Koreish assembled to discuss the
matter. It was
suggested to
al-Walid, their
chief, that they call
the Apostle of God a soothsayer. “He
is
not a soothsayer. We
have seen
soothsayers; he does not murmur and rhyme as they do.” Then it was suggested that
he was possessed
by djinns (wicked spirits—not as bad as a Satan but wicked: as God says in the Koran,
“I will surely fill
hell with Djinn and men together.” Sura 32:13).
“He is not possessed.
We have
seen lunatics and know them. He
does not
gasp, nor roll his eyes, nor mutter.”
A
poet? “He
is not a poet. We
know all the poets and their styles.
He is not a poet.”
What then?
The best will be to say that he is a sorcerer, because he
has come with
words which are sorcery and which separate a man from his father or
from his
brother or from his wife or from his family.
The
Koreish sat by the roadside during
the season of pilgrimage, warning everyone about Muhammad. Which, of course, only
made everyone more
interested and the fame of the Apostle of God began to spread outward
from
Mecca. The Koreish
imprisoned many of the
believers, heaped insults on them and tried to turn them away from
Islam. That
didn’t work either. So
they sent for Muhammad.
The Apostle of God hastened to them in the hope that they
had conceived
a favourable opinion of what he had told them.
But they only accused him once more of seeking riches and
power. This he
denied and reaffirmed his mission
from God. [They
said to him:]
“Ask, then, your Lord to send an angel to bear
witness to your
veracity. Ask Him
to give you gardens,
palaces and treasures of gold and silver to enrich you;
we know you go, now, to the markets to
procure food as we procure it. Then,
we
shall know your rank and station with Allah.”
The Apostle of God said, “I shall not do this,
nor ask for this. I
was not sent to you for this; but God has
sent me as a bearer of glad tidings and a preacher.”
They went on, “Then cause the heavens to fall
upon us, for we shall not
believe you unless you do something miraculous.” God’s Last
Messenger replied, “This is the
choice of God! If
He wishes, He will do
it.” Then
they said, “We shall not cease
to persecute you until we destroy you or you destroy us. We shall not believe you
until you come with
Allah and all the angels.”
Many
persecutions and imprisonments and
tortures of converts to Islam ensued, again, with no appreciable effect
apart
from bringing more converts.
The
Koreish
decided to counteract Muhammad’s influence by forming a
league against him and
his followers. They
applied economic and
social sanctions, forbade trade with him and banned the Believers from
marrying
Koreish women. This
boycott had some
success and the Apostle lived in a virtual stage of siege for close on
three
years, except during the period of pilgrimage.
All he could do was consolidate the faith of those who
were with
him. At last,
however, the ban was lifted
through the influence of several Koreish who—though not
Believers—sympathized
with their plight. The
Apostle was now
fifty years of age.
Khadija,
the wife of the Apostle, and Abu
Talib, his uncle and protector died the same year, reportedly within
three days
of each other. After
the death of Abu
Talib the Koreish heaped greater insults upon the
Prophet—which they would not
have attempted while Abu Talib was alive.
One strew dust on Muhammad’s head.
The Apostle went with the dust on his head to his house
and one of his
daughters washed it off and wept.
The
Apostle said, “Do not weep, my daughter.
God will protect thy father.”
Shortly
thereafter, a turning point in the
history of Islam took place. During the next season of pilgrimage,
Muhammad
went among the Arab tribes, introducing himself, and met a small
company of the
Khazraj—a most fateful meeting, indeed.
When
the
Apostle of God met them at al-Aqaba, he asked, “Are you
allies of the
Jews?” And
they said, “Yes.”
They sat down with him and he invited them to
believe in God, expounded Islam to them and recited the Koran. Now, God had ensured that
the Jews who lived
in the country of the Khazraj, and who were Children of the Book
(whereas the
Khazraj themselves were polytheists and idolaters) should always
say—whenever a
quarrel broke out between themselves and the
Khazraj—“A prophet will soon be
sent and we shall become his followers and kill you with his
aid.” So,
when the Apostle of God spoke to these
men of Khazraj and invited them to believe in God, they said to one
another,
“This is the prophet with whom the Jews have threatened us. We must forestall them and
join him before
they do.” Accordingly,
they accepted
Islam, saying, “We have left our people, for there is no
tribe so divided by
enmity and wickedness as they. Perhaps
God will unite them through you. We shall go to them and urge them to
accept
your views and this religion so that, if God unites them around you,
none will
be more exalted than yourself.” Then they returned to their
country as
believers.
When they reached Medina, they spoke of the Apostle of God
and invited
their people to accept Islam, so that acquaintance with it spread until
there
was not one among the dwellings of all their families in which the name
of the
Apostle of God had not been spoken.
The
converts in Medina became known as the ansar,
the Helpers.
The next year (621
C.E.), when the season of pilgrimage came again, twelve men
of the Helpers
met God’s Last Messenger at the hill of al-Aqaba; this is called the meeting
of “the first
hill”:
“We paid homage to the Apostle of God after the
unmilitant manner of
women—this happened before war was made incumbent upon us. We pledged that we would
not associate other
gods with God, nor steal, nor commit fornication, nor kill our female
children…”
Prior
to the advent of Islam, it had been
a commonplace practice among the tribal Arabs to bury
female babies alive in the sand.
Not all of them, of course, but enough that
female infanticide was, as I say, a commonplace practice in Arabia in
the
seventh century.
“…nor
tell lies,
nor disobey what is right. If
we fulfill
these conditions, paradise is to be ours; if we transgress and suffer
punishment in this world, it will be an expiation.
But if our sin remains concealed until the
Day of Resurrection, the affair rests with God to punish or
forgive.”
Skipping
ahead to the second
“meeting of the hill”:
“The
Apostle
of God came with his uncle al-Abbas, an unbeliever who, nevertheless,
wished to
see his nephew conclude a firm alliance.
Al-Abbas spoke first, saying, ‘You know that
Muhammad is our
kinsman! We have
protected him against
those of our own people who oppose him.
He enjoys great dignity among his people and protection in
his
country; nevertheless,
he shuns them and
wishes to ally himself with you…’”
I
suspect that this “white lie” was why
an unbeliever like al-Abbas was deputized to speak on behalf of the
Prophet. At the
very least it was an
exaggeration to say that Muhammad “enjoys great dignity among
his people and
protection in his country”.
But saying
it circumvented the obvious Arab tribal question of, “If
you’re the Prophet of
God, why are the people of your own tribe so opposed to you? And why should we protect
someone that
another tribe has so thoroughly rejected?”
I doubt the tribal Arabs would have been familiar
with—or much impressed
by—Jesus’ observation that “a prophet is
not without honour except in his own
country.” Keep
Uncle al-Abbas in mind,
he becomes quite significant much, much later on.
“‘If,
therefore, you think you can keep your promise and protect him against
his
enemies, you may assume the burden you have undertaken; but if there is
any
likelihood of your surrendering and abandoning him after he has gone
over to
you, then leave him be, for he is safer among his own people.’ Then we asked the Apostle
for his opinion and
he said, ‘I call on you to protect me as you would protect
your own women and
children.’ A
man called al-Bara then
took hold of his hand and swore, ‘We shall protect you
against everything from
which we protect our own selves. Accept
therefore our allegiance. We
are
warriors who have inherited the right to arms.’
“This speech was interrupted by Abul-Haytham,
who said, ‘We have ties
with other men (he meant the Jews of Medina) which we would have to
sever. If we do
this, and God aids you to victory,
will you not return to your own people and abandon us?’ The Apostle of God smiled
and replied, ‘By no
means. Blood is
blood, and shedding is
shedding; you belong to me and I to you.
I shall fight those whom you fight and I shall be at peace
with him who
is at peace with you. Bring
me twelve
leaders who may be charged with their people’s
affairs.’ And
they brought nine men from the Khazraj
tribe and three from the Aws tribe.
“The Apostle of God said to the twelve leaders,
‘You are the sureties
for your people just as Jesus’ disciples were and I stand
surety for my
people.’ And
they agreed.
“Al-Abbas asked the people, ‘Are you
aware of the conditions on which
you pledge allegiance to this man?
You
pledge yourselves to him, to wage war against all and sundry. If your possessions should
be ruined by
misfortune and your nobles slain, and you should give him up, then you
will
reap shame in this world and the next.
If, however, you think you can keep your promises in the
face of all
misfortune, then it will profit you in this world and the
next.’ They
replied, ‘We shall take him even at the
risk of losing all else,’ and turning to the Apostle, they
asked, ‘But what
will be our reward if we keep our promise?’
He replied, ‘Paradise!’ and they said,
‘Stretch forth thy hand,’ and
paid him homage.”
It
seems to me that this is one of the
linchpin moments in the history of Islam which—viewed in what
I, and I think
most reasonable people would assess as a “skewed”
fashion—underpins the notion
of martyrdom as a centrepiece of Islam.
Muhammad was seeking protection from
the Koreish and promising
the reward of Paradise for that protection. He doesn’t
attempt to whip the Khazraj into a
killing frenzy. Even
al-Abbas’ assertion
of what was at stake: “your possessions should be ruined, and
your nobles
slain,” doesn’t
suggest personal
martyrdom even as a subtext. Any
and all
men of the Khazraj
tribe, under tribal
law, would do exactly what the nobles of that tribe told them to do. If that entailed dying in
a conflict ordered
by the nobles, well, that was just part and parcel of being a tribal
member in
good standing. That
treaty just meant
that protecting Muhammad was one of the things that all members of the
tribe
were now responsible for—it was not intended that they would
provoke a suicidal
conflict in order to enter Paradise.
To
make a mental leap from that Arab tribal reality to
the Militant Islamic
misconstruction of jihad, “striving”—the
full expression, used
frequently in the Koran, is jihad fi sabeel allah: “striving
in the path/the way/the cause
of God”—is, to me (and again, I think to most
reasonable people and to most
Muslims) a lunatic extrapolation.
One
which worsens—anecdotally—even
as the vast majority of Arabs have been
liberating themselves from their tribal loyalties and tribal
constraints and
implicit tribal blood-thirstiness and have come into a fuller
possession of
their God-given exercise of autonomous free will:
even as the monotheistic—Muslim—nature
largely supplants the tribal—blood-thirsty
Arab—nature, it is, unfortunately,
still the vanishing population which dominates Islam and the perception
of
Islam both from within and without:
in
that it is hard to ignore an insignificant minority
or even to
accurately perceive it as a minority when its
members are blowing
themselves up in discos, in pizza parlours and on buses and, in the
process,
killing dozens of civilians, calling it “striving in the path
of God” and
viewing themselves as martyrs.
When
God gave
His Apostle permission to wage war, the promise to fight immediately
became a
condition of allegiance to Islam.
This
had not been so at the first meeting on the hillside, when homage was
paid “in
the manner of women”; God
had not then
given His Apostle permission to fight.
He had given permission neither to wage war nor to shed
blood, but only
to call men to God, to endure insults patiently and to pardon the
ignorant. Some of
the followers of the
Apostle had therefore been forced to flee from persecution into the
countryside, some to Abyssinia [sorry, owing to space
constraints I skipped
that part], others to Medina and elsewhere.
When the Koreish rejected the mercy of God and spurned His
prophet, they
tormented or drove away men who proclaimed the One-ness of God,
believed in His
prophet and adhered to His religion.
God therefore permitted Muhammad to fight and to aid his
followers
against those who tyrannized them.
The
first verse which came down permitting him to wage war and to shed
blood began
“Permission is granted unto those who fight because
they have been oppressed,
and God may
aid those who have been
driven from their homes merely for saying “Our lord is
God”…[decided
emphasis mine]
Again,
using this as a foundation for, as
an example, the intifada which the Arabs have been
waging in and around
Jerusalem for the last year and half is a lunatic extrapolation of a
Koranic
verse and the circumstances under which it was sent down to Muhammad. If there is any Jew who
has ever driven
anyone from his or her home for saying “Our lord is
God,” I
would sure like to meet him.
The
larger point that I’m trying to make
here is that it has to be born in mind when reading those Suras and
verses
which are concerned with waging war on the infidel (“Fight
against them until
there be no more temptation and until the religion be
God’s”) that they were
sent down to Muhammad after his alliance with the
Khazraj when God had
already given the pagan Arabs of Mecca, the Koreish, more
than
sufficient time to repent of their polytheism and their idolatry. Many, many of the suras of
the Koran make
mention of the fact that no civilization or people was ever destroyed
except
that God first sent “a plain warner,” a messenger
or a prophet to warn that
civilization or that people that they were skating on very thin ice,
the clock
was ticking down, times a-wasting, etc. etc.
(See Jonah’s warning to the people of Nineveh in
the Torah). Muhammad
preached daily in the sacred
precincts of Mecca for year upon year upon year the Word that God sent
down to
him through Gabriel. Finally,
in God’s
View (and who else’s View has any relevance in these
situations?) enough was
enough and harsher measures were required.
For the Koreish, the alliance forged by Muhammad with the
Khazraj meant
that the last few seconds on the clock had ticked down, time was up and
there
was going to be a very short sudden-death overtime period. To view those suras and
those verses which
document God’s seventh-century judgement
upon heathen, pagan idolators
as having even the vaguest relevance to the U.S. housing a military
contingent
in Saudi Arabia or Muslim boys getting their hair cut like Leonardo
diCaprio in
the twentieth century is, to me, and (I have to
believe) to any
reasonable thinking Muslim, not
only a
lunatic extrapolation of those suras and those verses but betrays
inescapable
evidence of a shameful inclination to perceive inaccurately: to
perceive the
U.S. presence in Saudi Arabia, or Muslim boys wearing their hair like
Leonardo
diCaprio—or even the existence the State of
Israel—as representing oppression
of Islam, thus
warranting God’s
permission to wage war. Muhammad
was
oppressed by the Koreish, Islam was
oppressed by the Koreish.
Because of that genuine oppression,
God gave Muhammad and his Muslim followers permission to fight against
the Koreish.
The
verse
continued by explaining that they (the Muslims) had
committed no crime
against the people (the Koreish) except that they
worshipped God, and
when they made Islam universal they
would observe the appointed
times for prayer,
give alms and enjoin
all men to do good and to abstain from evil.
Again,
I think it a lunatic extrapolation
to see this instruction as meaning “observe the appointed
times for prayer,
give alms, enjoin all men to do good and to abstain from evil and if
they—in
your view—don’t cooperate fully, then, by all
means, blow yourself up while
standing next to
them in a pizza
parlour.”
The
anonymous narrator of the events of
this second meeting concludes with:
“After
the act
of allegiance was over, Satan roared from the top of the hill in such a
loud
voice as I had never heard. He cried to the people of Mina (the
surrounding
countryside): ‘Beware
of this despicable
apostate and his followers! Verily
they
are assembled to attack you!’
And the
Apostle of God replied, ‘This is the Contemptible One of the
hill. Hearken to
me, O enemy of God! I
shall make an end of thee yet!’
Then the Apostle told the people to depart to
their caravans again, but one of them said, ‘If thou wish it,
tomorrow we shall
attack these people of Mina with our swords.’
The Apostle of God replied, ‘We have not been
commanded to do that.’
Accordingly we returned to our caravans and slept there till the
morning.”
There’s
a good example of “Djinn
possession” or the inability of pagan tribal Arabs to
distinguish their right
hand from their left, whatever you want to call it: “Hey, you
want us to
slaughter the people of Mina?”
Nonono. I’m
the Apostle of
God. Slaughtering
the people of Mina was
Satan’s idea.
Fourteen hundred
years later, that guy would probably fit the profile of a suicide
bomber.
When, on the hill, the Helpers swore allegiance to the
Apostle, to adopt
Islam, to aid him and those who followed him as well as any other
Muslims who
might seek shelter with them, he ordered his companions and others who
were
with him in Mecca to emigrate to Medina, that they might meet their
Helper
brothers. He said,
“God has marked out
for you kinsmen and homes where you may find refuge.” Accordingly, the Meccan
followers left the
city in groups. These
were afterwards known
as the mohajirun,
the Emigrants, and were then around a hundred in number.
But the Apostle of God remained in Mecca, waiting for
God’s command to
leave Mecca and to migrate to Medina.
The
command came and soon Muhammad was
living in Medina, where it became apparent that many of the Helpers
were not
exactly, well, helpful—paying
lip-service to Islam but openly doubting the political wisdom of
supporting the
Apostle against the Koreish. These
unhelpful Helpers came to be known—and reviled—as
the munafiqun, the
Hypocrites. Strategically,
Muhammad
attempted to win over the three Jewish tribes in Medina, the Banu
Qainoqa, Banu
Nadhir and the Banu Qorhaida (at
this
point he saw himself and his followers as indistinguishable from Jews
and
Christians so “one big happy family” was usually
the first option he would
pursue) to shore up his forces, drawing up a treaty specifying mutual
support,
and the paying of ransom and blood-ransom.
Ransom was a negotiated amount for the return of a
prisoner. Blood
ransom was the amount paid to the
family of someone that you had killed to keep them from sending someone
to kill
you. Even if the
text has been corrupted
over the centuries, it’s an interesting document, jumping
back and forth
between “tribal Arabic” and
“Islamic”:
In
the Name of God, the merciful, the
compassionate! This concerns the
Believers fled from Mecca
and those of Medina, as well as those who follow them; join with them,
and
fight with them, for they are a community excluding all other men!
This
would, to me—apart from the
salutation—be a good example of
the
“tribal Arabic” part of the treaty and was probably
not anything to get the
Jews—who had been on the losing end of
“excluding all other men” more
often than the winning end for about five
millennia by this
point—terrifically enthused.
Even when
the document becomes more “Islamic”:
Verily,
the protection of God is
indivisible and extends to the meanest Believer of all; and each must
befriend
other Believers above all men. Jews
who
follow us shall be given aid and equality;
they shall not be oppressed, nor shall aid be given to
others against
them. The safety of
Believers is
indivisible, no one shall be saved at the expense of another, when
battles are
being fought in the
name of God, save
with equity and justice.
…it
would not have taken a Talmudic
scholar (of which there was, reportedly, no shortage in the three
Jewish tribes
living in Medina) to recognize an “Oy vey” clause
when he saw it. “Save
with equity and justice”.
“So, uh, who—exactly—gets
to decide
what constitutes ‘equity and
justice’, in the event that—heaven
forfend—we should not see eye-to-eye on something?” That, as it turns out, was
covered in the
last sentence of the subsequent clause, which (I
would guess)
skyrocketed off the “Oy vey” scale and then charted
somewhere around 7.5 on the
“Oy gevalt” scale: “If you are at
variance on any matter, refer it to God or to Muhammad.” Considering that God was
possibly even called
Allah in the document (as it was translated) this would represent
something of
a (permit me to indulge in a little understatement here) problem
for the
Jews and they probably signed the treaty with the same philosophical
resignation that Israel’s representatives brought to the
signing of the Oslo
Peace Accord at the White House in 1993—while listening, on
that occasion, to
translations of Yasser Arafat’s speech celebrating the
document as a “final
solution”. You
know. Smiling on
the outside (never let the goyim
see you sweat) but with that “Oy gevalt”
look in their eyes.
There
follows in Ibn Ishaq’s biography of
the Apostle a number of anecdotes concerning Muhammad’s
relationship with the
Jews of Medina, sometimes with the Christians taking a hand, sometimes
not: the Jews
testing Muhammad with really obscure
questions of theology (many of which have, to me, the taint of Babylon
or, at
least, King Solomon about them, as well as Alan Moore’s
beloved—you should
again pardon the expression, feh—Kabalah
and what-not) which, with God’s
assistance, Muhammad always gets right.
There is even sura 18 (The Cave) which predates Medina
(again, according
to Ibn Ishaq’s biography) where the Jews told the Koreish how
to test whether
Muhammad was a prophet or a fake by asking him about this group of
believers
who had fled the Roman destruction of Jerusalem in 70 C.E. and who had
gone
into a cave. Muhammad
said, “I’ll tell
you tomorrow.” And
then didn’t hear anything
from Gabriel for about a month until he was really taking a beating
from the
Meccans and the Jews, credibility-wise.
According to prophetic tradition, this is where the term inshallah—God
willing—came from. Gabriel
berated the
prophet for saying “I’ll tell you
tomorrow,” instead of “if
God wills, I will give you an answer tomorrow”
or “perhaps my Lord will give you an answer
tomorrow.” You
know; you want to play “footsie” with the
Jews of Mecca, that’s one thing—God will take it
under consideration—but God is
not your on-call research assistant.
One noteworthy confrontation with a Christian sticks out,
to me:
A Christian asked Muhammad, “Do you want us to
worship you as we worship
Jesus, son of Mary?” The
apostle
replied, “God forbid that I should worship anyone besides
Him, or command any
other besides Him to be worshipped.
God
has not sent me to do that.”
This
is the fundamental Christian-Muslim
schism: what is
called in the Koran
“joining gods with God.”
I think Jesus (and
Mary, for that matter) would be appalled that they
were—and are— worshipped
as deities. “Jesus
is the son of God and
Jesus is God”.
You know, I just
can’t follow that. Dave
Sim is the son
of Ken Sim. Dave
Sim is not Ken
Sim. “Like
father, like son” is just an
expression of approximations. “The
apple
never falls far from the tree” is not synonymous with
“an apple is a
tree.” Nu?
The
Koranic verse which best approximates
my own thinking on the subject is contained in the sura The Table, 5:19:
Infidels, now, are they who say,
“Verily, God is the Messiah bin Mariam [son of Mary]!
Say: “And who could aught obtain
from God, if He chose to destroy the Messiah bin Mariam
And his mother and all who are
on the earth together?”
Exactly.
Do you really think that Jesus and Mary were as powerful
as God? That they
weren’t—as the Muslims claim—both
Muslims, in the sense of being completely submissive to
God’s Will? That
whatever ability they had—and have—to
intercede with God (something else which I, for one, sincerely doubt)
on behalf
of Christians supersedes God’s
Sovereignty? That
is, if the Virgin Mary wants you to be
blessed and God doesn’t want you to be
blessed that it’s, hey, just too
bad for God? It
seems to me that only
women and mothers can be stupid enough to believe that and
that—whatever stupid
women and mothers want to call it—it is
Goddess worship, plain and
simple. Blasphemy.
Anyway,
Muhammad, having been granted
permission to wage war against the Koreish launched his first attack in
623
when he was fifty-three years old.
He
equipped an expedition of twelve men and placed at its head Abdallah
bin Jahsh,
presenting him with sealed instructions he was not to open until he had
reached
the desert: “Go in the Name of God and with the blessings of
God to Nakhla and
there await the Koreish caravans.
Force
none of your men to accompany you.
Fulfill my commands with those who follow you of their own
free
will.” Jahsh
spied a small Koreish
caravan accompanied by four merchants.
In the middle of the night, as the full moon ushered in
the sacred month
(Rajab, in this case), the warriors attacked and bound the merchants. The caravan, laden with
leather, raisins and
wine fell into the hands of the robbers whose arrival back in Medina
was met
with consternation. It
was an
unforgiveable transgression of Arab tribal law to wage war in one of
the sacred
months. This led to
the sura verse:
They ask you about the Sacred
Month and if it is permitted to wage war in it.
It is a great
sin to fight in the Sacred
Month, but in the eyes of God, it is a much greater sin to shut
men out from the path of God and
from God’s House, the Kaaba.
(I
can’t vouch for the accuracy of the
transcription: those
suras contained in
the biographies of Muhammad get pretty mangled over
the centuries. I
repeat, these are not Scripture.)
From this point on, Islam becomes a strange
mixture of piety and banditry—which looks very strange from a
Judeo-Christian
“Thou shalt not steal” perspective, but which was
pretty much the status quo
for tribal Arabs. Arab
warfare was as
concerned with looting an enemy’s caravans as it was with
meeting him on the
battlefield…if not more concerned.
Next
came the battle of Badr, where the
Prophet—having bribed the Mecca-friendly tribes in the area
to turn a blind
eye—led three hundred men to Badr to intercept a large
Koreish caravan
returning from Syria. Abu
Sofyan, who was
leading the caravan, was no stranger
to desert intrigue and noticed date stones in the camel dung along his
route as
he approached Badr (only in Medina were dates plentiful enough to feed
to
camels). He changed
his route and sent
messengers ahead to Mecca where the Koreish raised an army of a
thousand in
pretty short order—which was really at the upper range of
what Arabs could even
conceive of in an armed force (just so ardent were
they to rid
themselves of the Muslims). So,
instead
of a caravan, Muhammad and his Muslims were met by an armed force three
times
their size. The
strange ballet of Arab battle
was enacted. First
poets rode in front
of each army, reciting their poems of warfare, ridiculing their enemies.
[Sorry.
That requires a short digression.
Poetry
was the life’s blood of the Arab, on the order of the Celtic
Bards. Powerfully
magical. A
particularly scathing and satirical poem
could undermine a man’s honour in a way that no sword could. At the same time, a poet
was viewed as a
thoroughly disreputable and low form of life: a profession for human
weasels. It was
Muhammad’s greatest
fear, as the suras were revealed to him, that he was becoming a poet
and the
perception that he was a poet persisted for many years: “Your
verses are very
beautiful”, “Your rhythm technique has created a
new epoch in our
literature.” To
which Muhammad could
only, wearily, reply, “I am not a poet and these are not my
poems. They are the
words of God which come from my
mouth.” In
answer to the accusation that
Muhammad wrote the suras himself, God repeatedly invites the accusers
to “bring
forth a sura like it, if ye be men of truth.”
The language of the Koran is still regarded as the most
perfect
incarnation of the Arabic tongue and its poetry—er
“poetry”—is so integral to
it that the printed Koran is regarded as a
commentary and only the recited
version—in Arabic—is considered scriptural.
“Iqra!”
“Recite!”]
Then individual
nobles rode out to challenge
their opposite numbers—in the case of the Muslims, Ali, Hamza
and Obaida. Who won
3-1:
three Koreish dead, one Muslim dead.
Seriously. This
was how an Arab
battle of the seventh century was conducted.
A decisive win by the hand-picked nobles over the
hand-picked nobles was
usually as far as it got.
However, in this case, the Koreish—being
infinitely greater
nobles than the rag-tag Muslims and with, consequently, a greater loss
of face
at stake—took the loss really badly and, against Arab
tradition, launched small
band after small band against the three hundred Muslims. One-by-one,
the best
soldiers of Mecca met their deaths at the hands of Muhammad’s
thoroughly
disciplined followers who just stayed in one body and met each attack
as it
came. Final score:
Muslims 70 Koreish 14
.
Chasing
the disgraced Koreish from the
field, the Muslims acquired 150 camels, 10 horses, 70 prisoners (to be
ransomed
for a tidy sum), as well as weapons and clothing.
As
a reward Ali was given Muhammad’s
daughter, Fatima, for his wife.
One
result of the battle of Badr was that
Muhammad became less convinced of the wisdom of the treaty he had
signed with
the Jews of Medina—now that he had seen that God’s
favour tended to
more-than-balance-out the odds against the Muslims.
As he told his followers, “Not you, but the
angels of God fought our victory today.”
Poetry figured here, as well—as many of the
Jewish youths of Medina
delighted in taunting the Prophet with their satirical verses.
The
Prophet was more sensitive to verses
of ridicule, to loose humour and to disrespect than he was to open
revolt and
resistance…the Prophet did not persecute or execute many
people and those who
were so punished were, more often than not, poets and jokers. “The satire of
the poet is more painful than
the lance of the enemy,” Muhammad once said, for he was
without a sense of
humour.
Medina
became an arena of terror. All
blood-ties, all bonds of friendship were
broken. Men were
murdered without anyone
daring to avenge them. No
one thought of
opposing the terror for now the Prophet was building the Nation of God. The Prophet was never
unjust in his
judgements. His
blows were brutal, but
they only hit the guilty.
It
was not accidental that the majority
of the punishment, murders and acts of terror were directed against the
Jews. Slowly but
steadily, the
relationship between Muhammad and the three Jewish tribes of Medina
grew worse. It
became more and more apparent that there
was no place in the Nation of God for the Jews (permit
me a small interpolation: HAH!].
For their part, the Jews were prepared to
submit to the new state of affairs, but their adherence to their own
faith was
steadfast. Haughtily,
they looked down
upon the wild prophet of the heathen.
Versed in Talmudic dialectics, they refuted
Muhammad’s arguments with
ease.
Let
me interrupt to say that the Jews
wouldn’t have had to retreat to the exotic confines of the Talmud
to
refute Muhammad. His
knowledge of the
Torah and the Gospels themselves was abysmal.
Reportedly, he believed that the Torah’s
Joseph—the second youngest son
of Jacob and father to Manasseh and Ephraim—and the Synoptic
Gospels’
Joseph—the father of Jesus—were the same Joseph. In defence of Muhammad he
never claimed that
the ideas and conclusions he had, personally, drawn from his own
cursory
knowledge of the Torah and the Gospels—gleaned in
conversation with Jews and
Christians—were scriptural.
He admitted,
quite readily, that he was just a man and that his own
sayings—later collected
as the Hasid—were just the sayings of a
man, however devout. It
was only as a conduit for the Word of
God—for the actual suras of the Koran—that he
claimed divine inspiration
and—further confessed—that he was as much of a
completely human bystander to
the suras revelation as were his hearers.
I haven’t read the Hasid, nor
have I any intention of doing so.
As, likewise, I have no intention of reading the Talmud or the Confessions
of St. Augustine. I find Scripture itself to
be more than
sufficiently daunting a challenge—and a feast for the
intellect—without
bothering myself about someone else’s fallible and human
opinions of what it is
that those Scriptures are saying.
How
could thirteen pages go by that fast? This might be a five-parter,
folks. Next issue:
the Battle of Mt. Ohod, the
Battle of the Ditch and Muhammad’s Return to Mecca (and,
hopefully, a few words
about The Mothers of the Faithful—Muhammad’s
wives—and Aisha, indisputably, his
favourite wife)